See:
This site has papers by Prof. Jeffrey Morris, professor of biostatistics. Some of the papers are technical and may be difficult for the layman. Others are fairly easy to understand, such as this one, which explains how the base rate fallacy applies to data from Israel:
Many of these papers debunk anti-vaxxer nonsense such as assertions about the VAERS database.
I know a Swiss antivaxxer and "fake news" is what calls this graph. He does not believe his own Federal Office of Public Health. Okay, that's how antivaxxers roll . . . But here is what makes it weird. He trots out a bunch of other graphs from the Federal Office of Public Health, and he claims they show the vaccines do not work. Maybe he thinks the Office made up this graph, but the others are real. Why would he trust the other graphs but not this one?
(Actually, the other graphs he cites do not show what he thinks. He misinterprets them. He is not the sharpest knife in the drawer.)
"The simple fact that the majority of Covid deaths are now unvaxxed, should be enough to convince anyone."
Here is a particularly good illustration of that:
This is what irks me the most. To be skeptical of science is one thing, but these people are skeptical of BASIC MATH. The efficacy numbers are crystal clear and it doesn't require an understanding of mRNA, virology, epidemiology or any of that "sciency" stuff. If one of Gwyneth Paltrow's jade eggs was proven to have the same efficacy, I'd stick one up my ass 24/7 with no questions asked.